6 Comments
User's avatar
Mike Miller's avatar

I listened to your podcast yesterday and you touched on this. Fantastic podcast and article.

ToxSec's avatar

thanks a ton. really appreciate it Mike!

State of Play's avatar

Thanks for this. Context bombs are a model-internal defense: the trap lives in the same token stream it's trying to control. That's exactly the category a mid-2026 study just tested at scale, finding every model-internal guardrail broke across 20,000+ adaptive attacks, while the one defense that held, zero leaks across 15,000 attacks, sat entirely outside the model, in code inspecting the output. NIST's proof from that same month formalizes why: no fixed rule set operating on the stream it's policing can be universally robust. So the honest thing your stopgap buys time for isn't a smarter trap; it's whatever's watching the tool calls once the model's out of the loop, which is the part of the stack your on-call step quietly assumes already exists.

ToxSec's avatar

that’s a fantastic way to put it. great stuff. it’s definitely not a traditional defense, but creative teams can use it to buy time. your right, on-call might end up appreciating it hah!

Dave Reed's avatar

Landmines work both ways. 😬 Especially in our current "shadow IT" dystopia, you'll have to hide them pretty carefully to avoid that one hapless analyst from crying wolf …

Besides, I think we're in the era of most dedicated attackers using models with no known guardrails to trip on this kind of welcome package.

ToxSec's avatar

honestly this one was a lot of fun. this would totally be a clever way to deal with that as well.

it may end up being more of an internal tool as jailbroken models will usually disregard these tactics.